Saturday, 03 September 2011 11:18
Traditional astrology has a bad reputation.It’s hard to discuss it without getting stuck on the grim determinism that traditional astrologers were supposed to have ascribed to, a nightmarishly linear and choiceless march to the grave. Indeed, the difference between traditional and modern astrology is most commonly identified with the extremes of the Free Will/Fate debate, with “modern” standing for “Free Will” and “traditional” standing for “Fate.”Yet this is not entirely fair, or accurate.
These philosophical extremes have been present for virtually the entire recorded history of astrology, with different authors presenting different positions.Each period presents a complex intertwining of choices and obstacles, destiny and decisions.Taking the time to understand how people in different places and periods saw this tangle is wonderfully educational, as it opens our eyes to different astrologies as the complex systems they are.
In the spirit of dispelling misconceptions and encouraging exploration, I’d like to present a small offering on how predictive techniques, philosophical positions and therapeutic solutions intersect in modern and traditional astrologies.By traditional, I refer primarily to Vedic, Hellenistic, Arabic, Medieval and Renaissance astrologies.







